Hello Scott,
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:05:03AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hmm... this is the third patch of a patchset, so it apply cleanly, if
>> the other 2 patches are first applied ... or should I base this patch
>> against current nand-flash tree, because this patch
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:05:03AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hmm... this is the third patch of a patchset, so it apply cleanly, if
> the other 2 patches are first applied ... or should I base this patch
> against current nand-flash tree, because this patch goes through your
> tree?
Ah, I miss
Hello Scott
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:15:12PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> +#define read_mode() in_8((volatile unsigned char __iomem *) \
>> +CONFIG_NAND_MODE_REG)
>> +#define write_mode(val) out_8((volatile unsigned char __iomem *) \
>> +
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:15:12PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> +#define read_mode() in_8((volatile unsigned char __iomem *) \
> + CONFIG_NAND_MODE_REG)
> +#define write_mode(val) out_8((volatile unsigned char __iomem *) \
> + CONFIG_N
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
- changes since v1:
moved the nand driver to drivers/mtd/nand/kmeter1_nand.c
as Stefan Roese suggested
- changes since v2:
added comments from Stefan Roese
- drivers/mtd/nand/kmeter1_nand.c only gets compiled if
CONFIG_NAND_KMETER1 is set in board con
5 matches
Mail list logo