On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Intension is that sf_ops should deals all spi_flash
> related stuff and sf_probe (which should renamed future)
> should be an interface layer for spi_flash versus spi drivers.
>
> sf_ops => spi_flash interface
> sf_probe => interface layer vs spi
Intension is that sf_ops should deals all spi_flash
related stuff and sf_probe (which should renamed future)
should be an interface layer for spi_flash versus spi drivers.
sf_ops => spi_flash interface
sf_probe => interface layer vs spi_flash(sf_probe) to spi drivers
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Sig
2 matches
Mail list logo