On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 18:15 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >
> > Yes the main reason for going maximum or based on controller setting
> > transfer is to improve sf performance. I missed your point as didn't
> > see much use cases from board to
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Gerhard Sittig,
>
> Thanks for your comments, please see below
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 22:29 +0530, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki wrote:
>>>
>>> Current sf uses FAST_READ comm
Hi Gerhard Sittig,
Thanks for your comments, please see below
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 22:29 +0530, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki wrote:
>>
>> Current sf uses FAST_READ command, this patch adds support to
>> use the different/extended read c
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 22:29 +0530, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki wrote:
>
> Current sf uses FAST_READ command, this patch adds support to
> use the different/extended read command.
>
> This implementation will determine the fastest command by taking
> the supported commands from the flash and th
Current sf uses FAST_READ command, this patch adds support to
use the different/extended read command.
This implementation will determine the fastest command by taking
the supported commands from the flash and the controller, controller
is always been a priority.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradh
5 matches
Mail list logo
