Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 02/41] pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDs

2015-09-03 Thread Simon Glass
On 30 August 2015 at 16:55, Simon Glass wrote: > My original pinctrl patch operating using a peripheral ID enum. This was > shared between pinmux and clock and provides an easy way to specify a device > that needs to be controlled, even it is does not (yet) have a driver within > driver model. > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 02/41] pinctrl: Add the concept of peripheral IDs

2015-08-30 Thread Simon Glass
My original pinctrl patch operating using a peripheral ID enum. This was shared between pinmux and clock and provides an easy way to specify a device that needs to be controlled, even it is does not (yet) have a driver within driver model. Masahiro's new simple pinctrl gets around this by providin