Hi Stefan,
On 3 April 2017 at 12:24, Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> On Montag, 3. April 2017 20:18:42 CEST Brüns, Stefan wrote:
>> On Montag, 3. April 2017 17:38:40 CEST you wrote:
>> >
>> > What am I missing?
>>
>> The following is a gross oversimplification, but might explain it:
>>
>> 1. Assume all of
Hi Stefan,
On 3 April 2017 at 12:18, Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> On Montag, 3. April 2017 17:38:40 CEST you wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 3 April 2017 at 08:26, Brüns, Stefan
> wrote:
>> > On Montag, 3. April 2017 01:23:17 CEST you wrote:
>> >> Hi Stefan,
>> >>
>> >> On 2 April 2017 at 15:34, Stefan
On Montag, 3. April 2017 20:18:42 CEST Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> On Montag, 3. April 2017 17:38:40 CEST you wrote:
> >
> > What am I missing?
>
> The following is a gross oversimplification, but might explain it:
>
> 1. Assume all of the 64kB of the aligned_buffer is dirty. (Likely, if the
> buffer
On Montag, 3. April 2017 17:38:40 CEST you wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 3 April 2017 at 08:26, Brüns, Stefan
wrote:
> > On Montag, 3. April 2017 01:23:17 CEST you wrote:
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> On 2 April 2017 at 15:34, Stefan Bruens
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 17:43:38 CE
Hi Stefan,
On 3 April 2017 at 08:26, Brüns, Stefan wrote:
> On Montag, 3. April 2017 01:23:17 CEST you wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 2 April 2017 at 15:34, Stefan Bruens
> wrote:
>> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 17:43:38 CEST Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Stefan,
>> >>
>> >> On 2 April 2017 at 07:10
On Montag, 3. April 2017 01:23:17 CEST you wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 15:34, Stefan Bruens
wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 17:43:38 CEST Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> On 2 April 2017 at 07:10, Stefan Bruens
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 05
Hi Stefan,
On 2 April 2017 at 15:34, Stefan Bruens wrote:
> On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 17:43:38 CEST Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 2 April 2017 at 07:10, Stefan Bruens
> wrote:
>> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 05:01:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >> On 04/02/2017 01:40 AM, Simon Glass wr
On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 17:43:38 CEST Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2 April 2017 at 07:10, Stefan Bruens
wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 05:01:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 04/02/2017 01:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> > Hi Marek,
> >> >
> >> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:15, Mare
Hi Stefan,
On 2 April 2017 at 07:10, Stefan Bruens wrote:
> On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 05:01:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/02/2017 01:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi Marek,
>> >
>> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:15, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >> On 04/01/2017 08:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>> On Ra
On Sonntag, 2. April 2017 05:01:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 01:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On 1 April 2017 at 14:15, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 04/01/2017 08:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 a problem was noticed when enabling driver model
On 04/02/2017 01:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 1 April 2017 at 14:15, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/01/2017 08:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 a problem was noticed when enabling driver model
>>> for USB: the cache invalidate after an incoming transfer does not
Hi Marek,
On 1 April 2017 at 14:15, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/01/2017 08:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 a problem was noticed when enabling driver model
>> for USB: the cache invalidate after an incoming transfer does not seem to
>> work correctly.
>>
>> This may be a probl
On 04/01/2017 08:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 a problem was noticed when enabling driver model
> for USB: the cache invalidate after an incoming transfer does not seem to
> work correctly.
>
> This may be a problem with the underlying caching implementation on armv7
> and ar
On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 a problem was noticed when enabling driver model
for USB: the cache invalidate after an incoming transfer does not seem to
work correctly.
This may be a problem with the underlying caching implementation on armv7
and armv8 but this seems very unlikely. As a work-around, use
14 matches
Mail list logo