Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/9] Rename run_command() to builtin_run_command()

2012-02-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 14 January 2012 01:45:50 Simon Glass wrote: > > The current run_command() is only one of the options, with > > hush providing the other. > > i can't grok this sentence > -mike > OK I will reword it. Regards, Simon ___

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/9] Rename run_command() to builtin_run_command()

2012-02-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 14 January 2012 01:45:50 Simon Glass wrote: > The current run_command() is only one of the options, with > hush providing the other. i can't grok this sentence -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ U-

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/9] Rename run_command() to builtin_run_command()

2012-01-13 Thread Simon Glass
The current run_command() is only one of the options, with hush providing the other. It really shouldn't be called directly in case the hush parser is being used, so rename this function to better explain its purpose. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v4: - Minor comment change for call t