On 11/23/2011 12:39 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/22/11 17:39, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 07:51 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2011 07:33 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini
On 11/22/11 17:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 07:51 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 07:33 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> On 11/21/11 17:33, Tom Rini wrote:
On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igo
On 11/22/2011 07:51 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 07:33 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/21/11 17:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>> On 11/20/
On 11/22/2011 07:33 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/21/11 17:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg
wrote:
> On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20,
On 11/21/11 17:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg
>>> wrote:
On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>
On 11/21/2011 07:41 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom
On 11/21/11 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>> On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg
>>> wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom Rini wrote:
> A number of boards are populated wit
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom Rini wrote:
A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
memory.
On 11/20/11 16:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
>>> memory. Other boards may simply use this as an easy way to identify
>
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom Rini wrote:
>> A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
>> memory. Other boards may simply use this as an easy way to identify
>> board revs. So we provide a function that ca
Hi Tom,
On 11/19/11 00:48, Tom Rini wrote:
> A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
> memory. Other boards may simply use this as an easy way to identify
> board revs. So we provide a function that can be called early to reset
> the NAND chip and return the result
A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
memory. Other boards may simply use this as an easy way to identify
board revs. So we provide a function that can be called early to reset
the NAND chip and return the result of NAND_CMD_READID. All of this
code is put into s
12 matches
Mail list logo