Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/6] arm, am33xx: add defines for gmii_sel_register bits

2013-08-28 Thread Enric Balletbo Serra
Hi all, Sorry for late reply, I was out of office. 2013/8/19 Tom Rini : > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:38:56PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher >> Acked-by: Mugunthan V N > > Looks fine, but can we get this tested on the isee board too? It's a > functional change

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/6] arm, am33xx: add defines for gmii_sel_register bits

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:38:56PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > Acked-by: Mugunthan V N Looks fine, but can we get this tested on the isee board too? It's a functional change there (since it was setting the NOTUSED bit that HW folks say really should not be se

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/6] arm, am33xx: add defines for gmii_sel_register bits

2013-08-19 Thread Heiko Schocher
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Acked-by: Mugunthan V N --- - changes for v2: defined all bits used in the gmii_sel register as Tom Rini suggested - changes for v3: rebased against u-boot-ti commit bb2a5d8f87fffb4fadfb205837decbd1b3e75f88 - changes for v4: - rebased against u-boot-ti commi