Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files greater than 2GB

2014-10-28 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
Hello Simon, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Suriyan, > > On 27 October 2014 13:48, Suriyan Ramasami wrote: >> The commands fatls/ext4ls give negative values when dealing with files >> greater than 2GB. >> The commands fatsize/ext4size do not update the variable filesize

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files greater than 2GB

2014-10-27 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Suriyan, On 27 October 2014 13:48, Suriyan Ramasami wrote: > The commands fatls/ext4ls give negative values when dealing with files > greater than 2GB. > The commands fatsize/ext4size do not update the variable filesize for > these files. > > To deal with this, the fs functions have been modif

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files greater than 2GB

2014-10-27 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
The commands fatls/ext4ls give negative values when dealing with files greater than 2GB. The commands fatsize/ext4size do not update the variable filesize for these files. To deal with this, the fs functions have been modified to take an additional parameter of type "* loff_t" which is then popula