Hi Masahiro,
On 7 August 2014 07:14, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:12:18 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom, York,
>>
>> On 6 August 2014 09:06, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:20:47AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi York,
>> >>
>> >> On 5 Aug
Hi.
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:12:18 -0600
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom, York,
>
> On 6 August 2014 09:06, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:20:47AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi York,
> >>
> >> On 5 August 2014 20:53, York Sun wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 8/5/14 7:15 PM, "Simo
Hi Tom, York,
On 6 August 2014 09:06, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:20:47AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi York,
>>
>> On 5 August 2014 20:53, York Sun wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 8/5/14 7:15 PM, "Simon Glass" wrote:
>>
>> But in this case why not just leave off the 'free
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:20:47AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> On 5 August 2014 20:53, York Sun wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8/5/14 7:15 PM, "Simon Glass" wrote:
>
> But in this case why not just leave off the 'freescale'?
> >>>
> >>> This is just an example. What if I chose "-a
Hi York,
On 5 August 2014 20:53, York Sun wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/14 7:15 PM, "Simon Glass" wrote:
But in this case why not just leave off the 'freescale'?
>>>
>>> This is just an example. What if I chose "-a arm" and "-v freescale".
>>>ARM has
>>> 300+ targets, but only 20+ are for Freesc
On 8/5/14 7:15 PM, "Simon Glass" wrote:
>>>
>>> But in this case why not just leave off the 'freescale'?
>>
>> This is just an example. What if I chose "-a arm" and "-v freescale".
>>ARM has
>> 300+ targets, but only 20+ are for Freescale. I could save time by
>>building a
>> lot less platforms.
Hi York,
On 5 August 2014 17:21, York Sun wrote:
> On 08/05/2014 04:07 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi York,
>>
>> On 5 August 2014 16:34, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2014 07:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
+ - build all Freescale boards with MPC83xx CPUs, plus all 4xx boards:
+ MAKEALL
On 08/05/2014 04:07 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> On 5 August 2014 16:34, York Sun wrote:
>> On 08/05/2014 07:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> + - build all Freescale boards with MPC83xx CPUs, plus all 4xx boards:
>>> + MAKEALL -c mpc83xx -v freescale 4xx
>>> + ** buildman -b
Hi York,
On 5 August 2014 16:34, York Sun wrote:
> On 08/05/2014 07:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> + - build all Freescale boards with MPC83xx CPUs, plus all 4xx boards:
>> + MAKEALL -c mpc83xx -v freescale 4xx
>> + ** buildman -b mpc83xx freescale 4xx
>> +
>
> This is not very clea
On 08/05/2014 07:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> + - build all Freescale boards with MPC83xx CPUs, plus all 4xx boards:
> + MAKEALL -c mpc83xx -v freescale 4xx
> + ** buildman -b mpc83xx freescale 4xx
> +
This is not very clear to me. Is the condition "AND", or "OR"? When I do
"MAKEALL
For those used to MAKEALL, buildman seems strange. Add some notes to ease
the transition.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
- Minor changes to the text
tools/buildman/README | 92 +++
1 file cha
11 matches
Mail list logo