On 08/04/2015 19:00, Andrej Rosano wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>>>
>>
>>
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> >> Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
> >>
> >
>
> checpatch reports some issues by patch 2/2. Can
Hi,
On 08/04/2015 17:37, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2015-04-08, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>>
>> checpatch reports some issues by patch 2/2. Can you please fi
On 2015-04-08, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>>> Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>
> checpatch reports some issues by patch 2/2. Can you please fix them and
> resubmit ? Thanks !
Applying the patch below
On 01/04/2015 13:32, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>> Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>>
>
checpatch reports some issues by patch 2/2. Can you please fix them and
resubmit ? Thanks !
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
==
Hi Chris,
On 01/04/2015 04:46, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
>
It was my intention to put it into the -next branch, ready to be merged
after release. Anyway, if there is still time for a new PR, I will try
to let it slipping in the current. First version o
Any chance of this being accepted into 2015.04?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano wrote:
>
>> Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the
>> mainline one, where the "arch/board approach" is not yet merged
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrej Rosano wrote:
> Please note that the patch is prepared against imx tree and not the
> mainline one, where the "arch/board approach" is not yet merged.
OK, it all works for me.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:53:58PM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:49 AM, wrote:
> > From: Andrej Rosano
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this series adds support for USB armory board. The patches are
> > prepared against imx tree as it uses the new arch/board approach.
>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:49 AM, wrote:
> From: Andrej Rosano
>
> Hello,
>
> this series adds support for USB armory board. The patches are
> prepared against imx tree as it uses the new arch/board approach.
>
> The first patch add introduces the arch/board approach for mx5,
> as already done fo
From: Andrej Rosano
Hello,
this series adds support for USB armory board. The patches are
prepared against imx tree as it uses the new arch/board approach.
The first patch add introduces the arch/board approach for mx5,
as already done for mx6.
The second patch adds basic support for USB armor
11 matches
Mail list logo
