Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] usb: omap: ulpi: fix ulpi transceiver access

2013-06-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, > On 06/20/2013 03:53 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi Tom > > > > Should I need to repost? > > Nope, we're good. Just had this assigned to Marek in patchwork when I > did my last pull request, despite telling Marek I'd do it via > u-boot-ti on IRC before. I'll pick this up s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] usb: omap: ulpi: fix ulpi transceiver access

2013-06-20 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2013 03:53 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > Hi Tom > > Should I need to repost? Nope, we're good. Just had this assigned to Marek in patchwork when I did my last pull request, despite telling Marek I'd do it via u-boot-ti on IRC before. I'll

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] usb: omap: ulpi: fix ulpi transceiver access

2013-06-20 Thread Michael Trimarchi
Hi Tom Should I need to repost? Michael On 06/10/2013 06:18 PM, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > This patch fix the omap access to the transceiver > configuration registers using the ulpi bus. As reported by > the documentation the bit31 is used only to check if the > transaction is done or still runn

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] usb: omap: ulpi: fix ulpi transceiver access

2013-06-10 Thread Michael Trimarchi
This patch fix the omap access to the transceiver configuration registers using the ulpi bus. As reported by the documentation the bit31 is used only to check if the transaction is done or still running and the reading and writing operation have different offset and have different values. What we n