On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> I thought I sent this yesterday when applying the patch, but I guess not...
>
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
>> This is a re-submission of the patch by Harald Welte
>> with minor modifications for rebase and cha
I thought I sent this yesterday when applying the patch, but I guess not...
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> This is a re-submission of the patch by Harald Welte
> with minor modifications for rebase and changes
> as suggested by Scott Wood [1] [2].
Applied to u-b
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:17:23 -0400
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I was hoping that the env OOB patch [1] would be considered for
> inclusion into this merge window [2] but I saw that your pull request
> on friday [3] did not include the patch. There has been no reply by
> you to version 2-
Hi Scott,
I was hoping that the env OOB patch [1] would be considered for
inclusion into this merge window [2] but I saw that your pull request
on friday [3] did not include the patch. There has been no reply by
you to version 2-4 of the patch but I believe that I successfully made
the modificatio
This is a re-submission of the patch by Harald Welte
with minor modifications for rebase and changes
as suggested by Scott Wood [1] [2].
This patch enables the environment partition to have a run-time dynamic
location (offset) in the NAND flash. The reason for this is simply that
all NAND flash
5 matches
Mail list logo
