On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:51:33PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 07/30/2013 12:02 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >>Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
> >>To enable full SMP support, we have to sw
On 07/30/2013 12:02 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
To enable full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary cores
into non-secure state also.
So we add an entry p
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:54:17AM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
> To enable full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary cores
> into non-secure state also.
>
> So we add an entry point for secondary CPUs coming out of low
Currently the non-secure switch is only done for the boot processor.
To enable full SMP support, we have to switch all secondary cores
into non-secure state also.
So we add an entry point for secondary CPUs coming out of low-power
state and make sure we put them into WFI again after having switche
4 matches
Mail list logo