Hi Tom,
On 6 September 2014 06:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:01:44PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > On 31 August 2014 20:06, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> > > We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
> > > lowlevel_init function. I
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:01:44PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 31 August 2014 20:06, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
> > lowlevel_init function. I guess developers generally use dedicated
> > debuggers for that, b
Hi Masahiro,
On 4 September 2014 20:55, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:01:44 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 31 August 2014 20:06, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> > We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
>> > lowlevel_
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:01:44 -0600
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 31 August 2014 20:06, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
> > lowlevel_init function. I guess developers generally use dedicated
> > debuggers for t
Hi Masahiro,
On 31 August 2014 20:06, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
> lowlevel_init function. I guess developers generally use dedicated
> debuggers for that, but it is difficult in some cases.
> (For example, my debugger cannot conn
We have not had a good method to debug the early boot stage such as
lowlevel_init function. I guess developers generally use dedicated
debuggers for that, but it is difficult in some cases.
(For example, my debugger cannot connect to the ARM processor when
it is in the secure state. It sometimes
6 matches
Mail list logo
