On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 06:52:44 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
> >> I was referring to what you mention below...
> >>
> >>852 - Safe printf() functions
> >>853 Define CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF to compile in safe versions of
> >>854 the printf() functions. These are defined
On 14-08-07 06:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 02:28:13 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, S
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 03:28:14 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> [snip]
>
> >> I don't want to be the first to defined it for all of armv7
> >
> > Honestly, we should just enable this CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF by default for
> > the good of humanity and all the things, since
Hi Marek,
[snip]
>> I don't want to be the first to defined it for all of armv7
>
> Honestly, we should just enable this CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINTF by default for the
> good of humanity and all the things, since this unbounded string handling is
> just evil (see how OpenSSL ended up, partly beca
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 02:28:13 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
On 14-08-06 05:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0
On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 01:48:06 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
> On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> +
> >> +#include
> >> +#include
> >> +#include
> >> +#include
> >> +
> >> +/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0
On 14-07-30 06:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0 */
+#define RESPONSE_LEN (64 + 1)
+
+static char *response_str;
I'd suggest to pass this "response_str
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:13:22 PM, Steve Rae wrote:
[...]
> +
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +/* The 64 defined bytes plus \0 */
> +#define RESPONSE_LEN (64 + 1)
> +
> +static char *response_str;
I'd suggest to pass this "response_str" around instead of making it
- add support for 'fastboot flash' command for eMMC devices
Signed-off-by: Steve Rae
---
I suspect that the "sparse image" handling (ie. the "while (remaining_chunks)"
loop)
has been implemented elsewhere -- I need help finding the original code to
determine
any licensing issues
Thanks, Ste
10 matches
Mail list logo
