Hi Tom,
On 28 October 2016 at 14:04, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:41:05PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 28 October 2016 at 11:59, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:18:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Coverity complains that this can overflow. If
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:41:05PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 28 October 2016 at 11:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:18:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Coverity complains that this can overflow. If we later increase the size
> >> of one of the strings in the
Hi Tom,
On 28 October 2016 at 11:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:18:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Coverity complains that this can overflow. If we later increase the size
>> of one of the strings in the table, it could happen.
>>
>> Adjust the code to protect against this.
>>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:18:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Coverity complains that this can overflow. If we later increase the size
> of one of the strings in the table, it could happen.
>
> Adjust the code to protect against this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID:
Coverity complains that this can overflow. If we later increase the size
of one of the strings in the table, it could happen.
Adjust the code to protect against this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 150964)
---
Changes in v3:
- Adjust to deal with what strncpy() actually
5 matches
Mail list logo