Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] XPedite5200 board support

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:31 -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: > Which define are you referring to? A quick glance looks like these 3 > defines are used legitimately. Am I missing something? Double *sigh*... I clearly didn't drink enough over the holidays (here). Ignore me. Sorry, jdl _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] XPedite5200 board support

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:17 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 13:47 -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Initial support for Extreme Engineering Solutions XPedite5200 - > > a MPC8548-based PMC single board computer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > > +/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] XPedite5200 board support

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 13:47 -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: > Initial support for Extreme Engineering Solutions XPedite5200 - > a MPC8548-based PMC single board computer. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > +/* > + * Use L1 as initial stack > + */ > +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_L

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] XPedite5200 board support

Initial support for Extreme Engineering Solutions XPedite5200 - a MPC8548-based PMC single board computer. Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + b