Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 19/26] dm: i2c: Move slave details to child platdata

2015-01-26 Thread Simon Glass
On 25 January 2015 at 19:05, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:27:13 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > >> At present we go through various contortions to store the I2C's chip >> address in its private data. This only exists when the chip is active so >> must be set up when it is probed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 19/26] dm: i2c: Move slave details to child platdata

2015-01-25 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:27:13 -0700 Simon Glass wrote: > At present we go through various contortions to store the I2C's chip > address in its private data. This only exists when the chip is active so > must be set up when it is probed. Until the device is probed we don't > actually record what a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 19/26] dm: i2c: Move slave details to child platdata

2015-01-25 Thread Simon Glass
At present we go through various contortions to store the I2C's chip address in its private data. This only exists when the chip is active so must be set up when it is probed. Until the device is probed we don't actually record what address it will appear on. However, now that we can support per-c