Hi,
On 13-06-16 12:58, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 13-06-16 04:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Hi,
On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13-06-16 04:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Hans de Goede
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to
Hi,
On 13-06-16 04:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to port to newer
SoCs, rewrite the current PSCI implementation in C.
Some inline assembly bits a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to port to newer
>> SoCs, rewrite the current PSCI implementation in C.
>>
>> Some inline assembly bits are required to access coproces
Hi,
On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to port to newer
SoCs, rewrite the current PSCI implementation in C.
Some inline assembly bits are required to access coprocessor registers.
PSCI stack setup is the only part left completely in asse
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to port to newer
SoCs, rewrite the current PSCI implementation in C.
Some inline assembly bits are required to access coprocessor registers.
PSCI stack setup is the only part left completely in assembly. In theory
this part could be split out o
6 matches
Mail list logo