Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/62] x86: Use unsigned long for address in table generation

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > We should use unsigned long rather than u32 for addresses. Update this so > that the table-generation code builds correctly on 64-bit machines. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng > --- > > Changes in v3: None > Changes in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/62] x86: Use unsigned long for address in table generation

We should use unsigned long rather than u32 for addresses. Update this so that the table-generation code builds correctly on 64-bit machines. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - Move table-related changes from a later patch - Rebase to mainl