On 6 February 2015 at 13:48, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 08:44, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/27/2015 04:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 27 January 2015 at 05:36, Przemyslaw Marczak
>>> wrote:
If no device is connected to I2C bu
Hi,
On 27 January 2015 at 08:44, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/27/2015 04:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27 January 2015 at 05:36, Przemyslaw Marczak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If no device is connected to I2C bus, the i2c probe command
>>> can take a lot of time for probe ea
Hello,
On 01/27/2015 04:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On 27 January 2015 at 05:36, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
If no device is connected to I2C bus, the i2c probe command
can take a lot of time for probe each address. This commit
reduces the busy timeout to 10ms for standard and high speed
mode
Hi,
On 27 January 2015 at 05:36, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> If no device is connected to I2C bus, the i2c probe command
> can take a lot of time for probe each address. This commit
> reduces the busy timeout to 10ms for standard and high speed
> modes. This doesn't break the transmission an also
If no device is connected to I2C bus, the i2c probe command
can take a lot of time for probe each address. This commit
reduces the busy timeout to 10ms for standard and high speed
modes. This doesn't break the transmission an also allow for
properly probe the devices.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Mar
5 matches
Mail list logo