Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Second step towards Kbuild: Descend down like Kbuild

2013-10-04 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mashahiro, On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hello Simon > > >> Can you please explain why you need to change the .lds files - sorry it is >> not obvious to me. > > > This series changes how objects are linked. > > Before this series, > drivers/bios_emulator/libatibios

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Second step towards Kbuild: Descend down like Kbuild

2013-10-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hello Simon > Can you please explain why you need to change the .lds files - sorry it is > not obvious to me. This series changes how objects are linked. Before this series, drivers/bios_emulator/libatibiosemu.o drivers/block/libblock.o drivers/pcmcia/libpcmcia.o ... are directly linke

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Second step towards Kbuild: Descend down like Kbuild

2013-10-03 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Masahiro, On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Note: > Update for v3 is the only patch subjects. > The patch body is the same as v2. > > > I have been just wondering why the U-Boot top Makefile is so dirty. > > It is sprinkled with SoC-specific code as follows: > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Second step towards Kbuild: Descend down like Kbuild

2013-09-30 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Note: Update for v3 is the only patch subjects. The patch body is the same as v2. I have been just wondering why the U-Boot top Makefile is so dirty. It is sprinkled with SoC-specific code as follows: ifneq ($(CONFIG_OMAP_COMMON),) LIBS-y += $(CPUDIR)/omap-common/libomap-common.o