Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-21 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM > binaries only use one type of relocation record, > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code > accordingly. > > 1. A Makefile rule is added that checks that no > other relocation

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Jeroen, On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:33:32 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: > Hello Albert, > > On 06/13/2013 08:54 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: > > > binaries only use one type of relocation record, > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code > accordingly. > >>> > > > > fyi, I ha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-16 Thread Jeroen Hofstee
Hello Albert, On 06/13/2013 08:54 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: binaries only use one type of relocation record, R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code accordingly. fyi, I had a look at the clang build and it doesn't boot after these patches... When constant pointers are used with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-13 Thread Jeroen Hofstee
On 06/13/2013 11:05 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Albert, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:47:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Albert, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM binaries only use one type of relocation record, R_ARM_R

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-13 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Albert, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:47:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > > This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM > > binaries only use one type of relocation record, > > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing re

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-12 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Hi Albert, On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:17:29 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM > binaries only use one type of relocation record, > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code > accordingly. > > 1. A Makefile rule is added that checks that no > othe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Lubomir, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:17 +0300, Lubomir Popov wrote: > Hi Albert, > Applied the series to a relatively fresh (yesterday's) u-boot-ti/master > and tested on a custom OMAP5430 board. Boots normally. USB storage and > Ethernet (dhcp & ping), SD/MMC, I2C are all working. > > Tested

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-11 Thread Lubomir Popov
Hi Albert, On 11/06/13 15:47, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > >> This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM >> binaries only use one type of relocation record, >> R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code >> accor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Albert, On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:17:29 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM > binaries only use one type of relocation record, > R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code > accordingly. This is a cosmetic version only; if no one complains loudl

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Optimize ARM relocation

2013-06-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
This series optimizes relocation by ensuring ARM binaries only use one type of relocation record, R_ARM_RELATIVE., then optimizing relocation code accordingly. 1. A Makefile rule is added that checks that no other relocation record types are generated except R_ARM_RELATIVE; build fails if this is