On 16 December 2014 at 09:31, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 16 December 2014 at 02:41, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> There are several problems in the code. The device tree decode is incorrect
>>> in ways that are masked due to a
Hi Bin,
On 16 December 2014 at 02:41, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> There are several problems in the code. The device tree decode is incorrect
>> in ways that are masked due to a matching bug. Both are fixed. Also
>> microcode_read_rev()
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> There are several problems in the code. The device tree decode is incorrect
> in ways that are masked due to a matching bug. Both are fixed. Also
> microcode_read_rev() should be inline and called before the microcode is
> written.
>
There are several problems in the code. The device tree decode is incorrect
in ways that are masked due to a matching bug. Both are fixed. Also
microcode_read_rev() should be inline and called before the microcode is
written.
Note: microcode writing does not work correctly on ivybridge for me. Fur
4 matches
Mail list logo
