> Am 06.09.2018 um 04:43 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro :
>
>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:22:07AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 05.09.18 04:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 04.09.18 09:49, AKASHI Takahiro
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:22:07AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 05.09.18 04:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04.09.18 09:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> This patch is necessary to run SCT.efi (UEFI Self-Cert
On 05.09.18 04:51, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04.09.18 09:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> This patch is necessary to run SCT.efi (UEFI Self-Certification Test).
>>> Returning EFI_SUCCESS can cheat SCT execution.
>>>
>>> Sign
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:16:38AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04.09.18 09:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > This patch is necessary to run SCT.efi (UEFI Self-Certification Test).
> > Returning EFI_SUCCESS can cheat SCT execution.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
>
> How hard woul
On 04.09.18 09:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> This patch is necessary to run SCT.efi (UEFI Self-Certification Test).
> Returning EFI_SUCCESS can cheat SCT execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
How hard would it be to implement a real delete instead?
Alex
> ---
> lib/efi_loader/efi_fi
This patch is necessary to run SCT.efi (UEFI Self-Certification Test).
Returning EFI_SUCCESS can cheat SCT execution.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
---
lib/efi_loader/efi_file.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_file.c b/lib/efi_loa
6 matches
Mail list logo