Hi Bin,
On 11 November 2014 18:50, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> On 11 November 2014 07:14, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
We want access PCI earlier in the in
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 11 November 2014 07:14, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> We want access PCI earlier in the init sequence, so refactor the code so
>>> that it does not require
Hi Bin,
On 11 November 2014 07:14, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> We want access PCI earlier in the init sequence, so refactor the code so
>> that it does not require use of a BSS variable to work. This will allow us
>> to use early malloc(
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> We want access PCI earlier in the init sequence, so refactor the code so
> that it does not require use of a BSS variable to work. This will allow us
> to use early malloc() to store information about a PCI hose.
>
> Common PCI code
We want access PCI earlier in the init sequence, so refactor the code so
that it does not require use of a BSS variable to work. This will allow us
to use early malloc() to store information about a PCI hose.
Common PCI code moves to arch/x86/cpu/pci.c and a new
board_pci_setup_hose() function is
5 matches
Mail list logo