Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Flex-OneNAND driver

2009-03-17 Thread Amul Kumar Saha
Hi Scott, >Do you see this going into Linux soon? Unless there's some particular >obstacle to that (other than the code's readiness) I think I'd rather >wait for it to be accepted there, with (hopefully) more eyes looking over >it, and then bring the result into u-boot. All the review comments a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Flex-OneNAND driver

2009-03-09 Thread Scott Wood
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:45:37AM +0530, Rohit Hagargundgi wrote: > Sorries for the delay > > On Tuesday 16 December 2008 03:14:22 Scott Wood wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Rohit Hagargundgi wrote: > > > This patch adds support for MLC OneNAND and Flex-OneNAND devices. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Flex-OneNAND driver

2009-03-07 Thread Rohit Hagargundgi
Hi, Sorries for the delay On Tuesday 16 December 2008 03:14:22 Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Rohit Hagargundgi wrote: > > This patch adds support for MLC OneNAND and Flex-OneNAND devices. > > Patch does not apply to u-boot-nand-flash/next (the master branch is for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Flex-OneNAND driver

2008-12-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:57:18PM +0530, Rohit Hagargundgi wrote: > This patch adds support for MLC OneNAND and Flex-OneNAND devices. Patch does not apply to u-boot-nand-flash/next (the master branch is for 2008.12 bugfixes only). It's looking a lot better (though I'm not familiar enough with th

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Flex-OneNAND driver

2008-12-11 Thread Rohit Hagargundgi
This patch adds support for MLC OneNAND and Flex-OneNAND devices. The differences are like this. OneNAND features: 1. 2KB page 2. 64 pages per block. 3. Upto 4 writes to a page allowed. 4. 1 ECC register 5. OOB read and OOB write commands present. MLC OneN