On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:36:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 23.10.18 03:08, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:42:32AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22.10.18 08:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:40:05PM +0900, AKASHI Takah
On 23.10.18 03:08, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:42:32AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22.10.18 08:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:40:05PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
The current scenario for default UEFI booting, scan_dev_for_efi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:42:32AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 22.10.18 08:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:40:05PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> The current scenario for default UEFI booting, scan_dev_for_efi, has
> >> several issues:
> >> * load dtb dynam
On 22.10.18 08:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:40:05PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> The current scenario for default UEFI booting, scan_dev_for_efi, has
>> several issues:
>> * load dtb dynamically even if its loacation (device) is not the same
>> as BOOTEFI_NAME bin
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:40:05PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> The current scenario for default UEFI booting, scan_dev_for_efi, has
> several issues:
> * load dtb dynamically even if its loacation (device) is not the same
> as BOOTEFI_NAME binary's, (reported by Alex)
> * invoke 'bootmgr' onl
The current scenario for default UEFI booting, scan_dev_for_efi, has
several issues:
* load dtb dynamically even if its loacation (device) is not the same
as BOOTEFI_NAME binary's, (reported by Alex)
* invoke 'bootmgr' only if BOOTEFI_NAME binary does exit even though
'bootmgr' can and should w
6 matches
Mail list logo