Hello Hans,
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:37:40 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: Tom Rini
>
> For similar reasons to why the Linux Kernel has an EXPERT option, we too
> want an option to allow for tweaking of some options that while normally
> should remain hidden, may need to be changed in some ca
Hello Masahiro,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:15:01 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:08:05 +0100
> Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>
> > Hello Masahiro,
> >
> > > I prefer describing the patch dependency in the cover letter
> > > to resending the same patch.
> >
> > Di
Hi Albert,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:08:05 +0100
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Masahiro,
>
> > I prefer describing the patch dependency in the cover letter
> > to resending the same patch.
>
> Ditto -- but since patch numbers won't matter once applied and since
> Tom is properly attributed, it w
Hello Masahiro,
> I prefer describing the patch dependency in the cover letter
> to resending the same patch.
Ditto -- but since patch numbers won't matter once applied and since
Tom is properly attributed, it won't matter much whether Tom applies
his own patch or I apply it as part of this serie
This is identical to
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/399458/
posted by Tom Rini a month ago.
Why is it taking so long for this patch?
I prefer describing the patch dependency in the cover letter
to resending the same patch.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:37:40 +0100
Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: To
From: Tom Rini
For similar reasons to why the Linux Kernel has an EXPERT option, we too
want an option to allow for tweaking of some options that while normally
should remain hidden, may need to be changed in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Acked-by: Hans de Goede
Signed-off-by: Hans de Go
6 matches
Mail list logo
