-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/12 11:34, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 17-09-2012 19:27, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves
>> wrote:
>>> On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: S
On 17-09-2012 19:27, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/12 10:08, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On 09/17/12 10:08, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> >>On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +
On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/12 10:08, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves
wrote:
On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/12 10:08, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
> On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +010
On 09/17/2012 12:08:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 09/17/12 10:03, Scott Wood wrote:
> Weak symbols are not OK for configuring printf out of the SPL, as
you'll
> still have all the format strings and caller code in the binary. It
> should be a macro (or an inline function that replaces the standar
On 09/17/12 10:03, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 11:57:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
>> > On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
>> > >>On 14-09-2012
On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
NAND
On 09/17/2012 11:57:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves
wrote:
> >>On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>Dear Jos? Migue
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> >>On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> >>>
> NAND Flash driver with
Hi Marek,
On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
[...]
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+#define MAX_CHI
On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
Signed-off-by: Jos
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:20:32PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:24:48PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> > >
> > > > NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> > > > Curre
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:24:48PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> >
> > > NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> > > Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jos?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:21:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
>
> > NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> > Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
>
> [...]
>
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#inclu
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
> On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,
> >
> >>NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> >>Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Jos? Miguel Gon?alves
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:00PM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves wrote:
> NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves
[snip]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +#define printf(arg...) do {} while (0)
> +#e
On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
[...]
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+#define MAX_CHIPS 2
+
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
> NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
> Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
[...]
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +#define MAX_CHIPS2
> +static int nand_cs[MAX
NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs.
Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding style cleanup
- Use of clrsetbits_le32()
- Use of register bit macros instead of magic numbers
---
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
20 matches
Mail list logo
