Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/23] SPL: make struct spl_image 64-bit safe

2016-12-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:52:13AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > Since entry_point and load_addr are addresses, they should be > represented as longs to cover the whole address space and to avoid > warning when compiling the SPL in 64-bit. > Also adjust debug prints to add the 'l' specifier, where

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/23] SPL: make struct spl_image 64-bit safe

2016-12-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:52:13AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > Since entry_point and load_addr are addresses, they should be > represented as longs to cover the whole address space and to avoid > warning when compiling the SPL in 64-bit. > Also adjust debug prints to add the 'l' specifier, wher

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/23] SPL: make struct spl_image 64-bit safe

2016-12-04 Thread Simon Glass
On 4 December 2016 at 18:52, Andre Przywara wrote: > Since entry_point and load_addr are addresses, they should be > represented as longs to cover the whole address space and to avoid > warning when compiling the SPL in 64-bit. > Also adjust debug prints to add the 'l' specifier, where needed. > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/23] SPL: make struct spl_image 64-bit safe

2016-12-04 Thread Andre Przywara
Since entry_point and load_addr are addresses, they should be represented as longs to cover the whole address space and to avoid warning when compiling the SPL in 64-bit. Also adjust debug prints to add the 'l' specifier, where needed. Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf --