Hi Simon,
Thanks for your patches, It works very good. I have test the patch
set on firefly-rk3399,
and the SPL works with OF_PLATDATA after I fix issue in clk(Philipp has
point out) driver,
sdram driver and sdhci driver, I will send out my fix later.
Pls add my test tag for this patc
Hi Philipp,
On 30 August 2017 at 18:12, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
>
>> On 30 Aug 2017, at 11:37, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> On 30 August 2017 at 04:31, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
>> wrote:
>>> Simon,
>>>
>>> I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the
>
> On 30 Aug 2017, at 11:37, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On 30 August 2017 at 04:31, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the
>> week.
>> For the RK3399 our board uses full OF_CONTROL, so I won’t really
Hi Philipp,
On 30 August 2017 at 04:31, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the
> week.
> For the RK3399 our board uses full OF_CONTROL, so I won’t really exercise
> this there.
>
> Given that the RK3399 can always fall b
Simon,
I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the week.
For the RK3399 our board uses full OF_CONTROL, so I won’t really exercise
this there.
Given that the RK3399 can always fall back to OF_CONTROL for SPL (as is the
default on Puma) and this only blocks the RK336
This series updates dtoc to support 64-bit addresses automatically. These
appear in C code as fdt64_t arrays:
struct dtd_test1 {
fdt64_t reg[2];
};
static struct dtd_test1 dtv_test1 = {
.reg= {0x1234, 0x5678},
};
C code can then process these address
6 matches
Mail list logo
