Hi
On Aug 4, 2016 05:38, "Kever Yang" wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Do you think this patch is necessary?
>
Yes, I have checked it and fix the regression. Today I will confirm on hot
correctness but I think too
Michael
> Thanks,
> -Kever
>
> On 07/29/2016 11:12 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
>>
>> The
Hi Michael,
Do you think this patch is necessary?
Thanks,
-Kever
On 07/29/2016 11:12 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
size '-', because both fist_usable_lba and last_usable_lba will remain
34 sectors.
We can simply use 0 for siz
The calculation of "dev_desc->lba - 34 - 1 - offset" is not correct for
size '-', because both fist_usable_lba and last_usable_lba will remain
34 sectors.
We can simply use 0 for size '-' because the part_efi module will decode
the size and auto extend the size to maximum available size.
Signed-
3 matches
Mail list logo