Sigh. It wasn't. It's a hypothetical possibility to help guide the
decision of whether to classify a piece of code as "arm64" or "armv8".
-Scott
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 10:30 +0530, Mj Embd wrote:
> When "64-bit ARMv9" was announced ?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Scott Wood
> wrote:
When "64-bit ARMv9" was announced ?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 16:37 +0800, FengHua wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -原始邮件-
> > > 发件人: "Scott Wood"
> > > 发送时间: 2013年9月17日 星期二
> > > 收件人: feng...@phytium.com.cn
> > > 抄送: u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 16:37 +0800, FengHua wrote:
>
>
> > -原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "Scott Wood"
> > 发送时间: 2013年9月17日 星期二
> > 收件人: feng...@phytium.com.cn
> > 抄送: u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.com, albert.u.b...@aribaud.net,
> > w...@denx.de, b45...@freescale.com
> > 主题: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] core
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Scott Wood"
> 发送时间: 2013年9月17日 星期二
> 收件人: feng...@phytium.com.cn
> 抄送: u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.com, albert.u.b...@aribaud.net,
> w...@denx.de, b45...@freescale.com
> 主题: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] core support of arm64
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:08 +0800, feng...@ph
Dear Scott,
In message <1379373546.2536.199.ca...@snotra.buserror.net> you wrote:
>
> > + *
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
> > + */
>
> Note that Tom said he'd be OK with using GPL2-only code from Linux, as
> long as it's properly attributed.
But we do prefer GPL-2.0+ whenever
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:08 +0800, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
> From: David Feng
>
> Signed-off-by: David Feng
> ---
You've still got CONFIG_ARMV8 in places that should be CONFIG_ARM64
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/exceptions.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/exceptions.S
> new file mode 100644
>
From: David Feng
Signed-off-by: David Feng
---
arch/arm/config.mk |4 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/Makefile | 38 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache.S | 130 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/cache_v8.c | 228 +
7 matches
Mail list logo
