On 17 April 2017 at 22:00, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 17 April 2017 at 09:48, Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
>> The calculation of the variable header size in rkcommon_vrec_header
>> had been update twice in the earlier series (introducing boot0-style
>> images to deal with the alignment of the first inst
On 17 April 2017 at 09:48, Philipp Tomsich <
philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
> The calculation of the variable header size in rkcommon_vrec_header
> had been update twice in the earlier series (introducing boot0-style
> images to deal with the alignment of the first instruction in 64b
The calculation of the variable header size in rkcommon_vrec_header
had been update twice in the earlier series (introducing boot0-style
images to deal with the alignment of the first instruction in 64bit
binaries). Unfortunately, I didn't update the comment twice (so it
remained out-of-date).
Thi
3 matches
Mail list logo
