Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] fsl_sata: Add the workaround for errata SATA-A001

2010-04-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dave Liu, In message <1270769522-27230-1-git-send-email-dave...@freescale.com> you wrote: > After power on, the SATA host controller of P1022 Rev1 is configured > in legacy mode instead of the expected enterprise mode. > > Software needs to clear bit[28] of HControl register to change to > e

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] fsl_sata: Add the workaround for errata SATA-A001

2010-04-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Dave Liu wrote: > After power on, the SATA host controller of P1022 Rev1 is configured > in legacy mode instead of the expected enterprise mode. > > Software needs to clear bit[28] of HControl register to change to > enterprise mode after bringing the host offline. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] fsl_sata: Add the workaround for errata SATA-A001

2010-04-08 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Dave Liu wrote: > >> +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2) && defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001) > > Is there ever a situation where CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001 is > defined but CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2 is not defined? N

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] fsl_sata: Add the workaround for errata SATA-A001

2010-04-08 Thread Timur Tabi
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Dave Liu wrote: > +#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2) && defined(CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001) Is there ever a situation where CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001 is defined but CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2 is not defined? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] fsl_sata: Add the workaround for errata SATA-A001

2010-04-08 Thread Dave Liu
After power on, the SATA host controller of P1022 Rev1 is configured in legacy mode instead of the expected enterprise mode. Software needs to clear bit[28] of HControl register to change to enterprise mode after bringing the host offline. Signed-off-by: Dave Liu --- * address Kumar's comments