Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup

2014-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 11:16 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:32:04 +0100 > Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 09:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > Probably the board [...] selection could be moved out > > > without any dependencies, although the b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup

2014-10-05 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Ian, On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:32:04 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 09:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Probably the board [...] selection could be moved out > > without any dependencies, although the board one in particular will be > > quite a big patch I think it would be w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup

2014-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 09:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Probably the board [...] selection could be moved out > without any dependencies, although the board one in particular will be > quite a big patch I think it would be worth it. On the topic of board selection which way round should the SoC v

[U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 0/3] sunxi: Kconfig consolidation and cleanup

2014-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
A few simple patches which consolidate some Kconfig options and make SPL_FEL a first class .config member instead of putting it in CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS. This means it is possible to do a FEL build for any board with: make _config echo CONFIG_SPL_FEL=y >> .config echo CO