Dear Kumar,
In message you wrote:
>
> Hmm, how about dumping all of the LBC registers and comparing
> before/after this change.
After the change (here with 2010.09-00558-g79e6313):
Board: TQM8555, serial# ABC0555 casl=25
I2C: ready
DRAM: 128 MiB
FLASH: 128 MiB
L2:256 KB already enabled
On Oct 25, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Becky,
>
> In message <1276792647-4563-4-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you
> wrote:
>> Currently, 83xx, 86xx, and 85xx have a lot of duplicated code
>> dedicated to defining and manipulating the LBC registers. Merge
>> this
Dear Becky,
In message <1276792647-4563-4-git-send-email-bec...@kernel.crashing.org> you
wrote:
> Currently, 83xx, 86xx, and 85xx have a lot of duplicated code
> dedicated to defining and manipulating the LBC registers. Merge
> this into a single spot.
>
> To do this, we have to decide on a com
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Becky Bruce wrote:
> Currently, 83xx, 86xx, and 85xx have a lot of duplicated code
> dedicated to defining and manipulating the LBC registers. Merge
> this into a single spot.
>
> To do this, we have to decide on a common name for the data structure
> that holds th
4 matches
Mail list logo
