On 08/12/2015 08:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 11 August 2015 at 08:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> The existing FAT filesystem implementation in U-Boot has some bugs that
>> are tricky to fix cleanly without significant rework of the code. For
>> example, see:
>>
>> http://lists.de
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:55:35AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> The existing FAT filesystem implementation in U-Boot has some bugs that
> are tricky to fix cleanly without significant rework of the code. For
> example, see:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-July/221054.html
> [PATC
Hi Stephen,
On 11 August 2015 at 08:55, Stephen Warren wrote:
> The existing FAT filesystem implementation in U-Boot has some bugs that
> are tricky to fix cleanly without significant rework of the code. For
> example, see:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-July/221054.html
> [PATCH]
The existing FAT filesystem implementation in U-Boot has some bugs that
are tricky to fix cleanly without significant rework of the code. For
example, see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-July/221054.html
[PATCH] fat: handle paths that include ../
This series replaces U-Boot's FAT file
4 matches
Mail list logo