Hi Maxime,
> On May 10, 2016, at 14:45 , Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>
[snip]
> How do you want me to proceed?
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
FYI an updated dtc patch has been sent. Hopefu
Hi Maxime,
On 10 May 2016 at 05:45, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I'm finally taking the time to address the reviews that have been made
> here.
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:40:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>> On 4 April 2016 at 12:25, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > The
Hi Simon,
I'm finally taking the time to address the reviews that have been made
here.
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:40:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On 4 April 2016 at 12:25, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> > boar
Hi Simon,
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:55:07PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On 4 April 2016 at 12:25, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> > boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> > easily
Hi Maxime,
On 4 April 2016 at 12:25, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> easily plug new board in (like the BBB or the raspberry pi).
>
> However, so far, the usual m
Hi Tom,
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 22:42 , Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:29:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Maxime,
>>>
On Apr 4, 2016, at 11:25 , Maxime Ripard
wrote:
The device tree overla
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:29:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> >> On Apr 4, 2016, at 11:25 , Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> >> boards or boa
Hi Maxime,
On 4 April 2016 at 12:25, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> easily plug new board in (like the BBB or the raspberry pi).
>
> However, so far, the usual m
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> On Apr 4, 2016, at 11:25 , Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>>
>> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
>> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
>> easily plug new bo
Hi Maxime,
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 11:25 , Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>
> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> easily plug new board in (like the BBB or the raspberry pi).
>
> However, so far, t
The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
easily plug new board in (like the BBB or the raspberry pi).
However, so far, the usual mechanism to deal with it was to have in Linux
some driver detecting t
11 matches
Mail list logo