Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201206090148.40933.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > > Multiplication being commutative, I see zero effect in this patch?
> >
> > Well, not in every algebraic system. It has zero effect, it's only
> > about correctness [1]. Will applying th
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201206090148.40933.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > Multiplication being commutative, I see zero effect in this patch?
>
> Well, not in every algebraic system. It has zero effect, it's only about
> correctness [1]. Will applying this break anything?
In which way
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <1339176514-13137-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > -#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(size, 1)
> > +#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(1, size)
>
> Does this make any practical difference?
>
> I mean, are you aw
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <1339176514-13137-1-git-send-email-ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> -#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(size, 1)
> +#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(1, size)
Does this make any practical difference?
I mean, are you aware of any problem that gets fixed by this patch
Quote from the manpage:
[...]
void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size);
[...]
DESCRIPTION
[...]
The calloc() function allocates memory for an array of nmemb elements
of size bytes each and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The
memory is set to zero. If nmemb
5 matches
Mail list logo
