On 04/08/2013 05:59 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 01:25:01 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Mike Dunn,
>>
>> > This patch adds a driver for the diskonchip G4 nand flash device. It is
>> > based on the driver from the linux kernel.
>> >
>> > This also includes a separate SPL driver. A separa
On 04/08/2013 01:25:01 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Mike Dunn,
> This patch adds a driver for the diskonchip G4 nand flash device.
It is
> based on the driver from the linux kernel.
>
> This also includes a separate SPL driver. A separate SPL driver is
used
> because the device operates i
Dear Mike Dunn,
> On 04/07/2013 11:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> [..]
>
> > Try #ifdef U_BOOT instead of #if 0, no?
>
> Marek, can you clarify? Do you mean something like...
>
> #define U_BOOT
> ...
> #ifndef U_BOOT /* Currently u-boot does not have for_each_set_bit */
> unsigned
On 04/07/2013 11:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
[..]
> Try #ifdef U_BOOT instead of #if 0, no?
Marek, can you clarify? Do you mean something like...
#define U_BOOT
...
#ifndef U_BOOT /* Currently u-boot does not have for_each_set_bit */
unsigned long bits = ~buf[i];
Dear Mike Dunn,
> This patch adds a driver for the diskonchip G4 nand flash device. It is
> based on the driver from the linux kernel.
>
> This also includes a separate SPL driver. A separate SPL driver is used
> because the device operates in a different mode (reliable mode) when
> loading a b
This patch adds a driver for the diskonchip G4 nand flash device. It is based
on the driver from the linux kernel.
This also includes a separate SPL driver. A separate SPL driver is used because
the device operates in a different mode (reliable mode) when loading a boot
image, and also because t
6 matches
Mail list logo
