On 04/10/2016 07:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 11:34 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On 5 April 2016 at 16:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is
no longer necessary for the te
Thanks for the feedback Simon.
On 04/09/2016 11:34 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 5 April 2016 at 16:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>>
>>> With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is
>>> no longer necessary for the tegra-specific xlate
Hi Stephen,
On 5 April 2016 at 16:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>
>> With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is
>> no longer necessary for the tegra-specific xlate function to do this.
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c
On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote:
With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is
no longer necessary for the tegra-specific xlate function to do this.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c
@@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ static int tegra_gpio_xl
With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is
no longer necessary for the tegra-specific xlate function to do this.
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson
---
drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio
5 matches
Mail list logo