2012/6/20 Rajeshwari Birje :
> Hi Minkyu Kang,
>
> This being I2C driver code should not have any dependency on EVT0 or EVT1.
I mean *all* arch and driver codes for Exynos5250 should support EVT1 only.
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Rajeshwari Shinde.
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Minkyu Kang wr
Hi Minkyu Kang,
This being I2C driver code should not have any dependency on EVT0 or EVT1.
Regards,
Rajeshwari Shinde.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Rajeshwari Birje,
>
> On 19 June 2012 19:57, Rajeshwari Birje wrote:
>> Hi Joonyoung Shim,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 201
Dear Rajeshwari Birje,
On 19 June 2012 19:57, Rajeshwari Birje wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung Shim,
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I add some comments at the below.
>>
> -- ok
>> And current SMDK5250 uses Exynos5250 EVT0 base codes,
>> but i know the kernel suppor
Hi Joonyoung Shim,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I add some comments at the below.
>
-- ok
> And current SMDK5250 uses Exynos5250 EVT0 base codes,
> but i know the kernel supports only Exynos5250 EVT1.
>
> So, let's remove Exynos5250 EVT0 codes and add EVT1 code
Hi,
I add some comments at the below.
And current SMDK5250 uses Exynos5250 EVT0 base codes,
but i know the kernel supports only Exynos5250 EVT1.
So, let's remove Exynos5250 EVT0 codes and add EVT1 codes at the u-boot also.
Could you follow up it?
Thanks.
2012/6/19 Rajeshwari Shinde :
> This pa
This patch modifies the S3C I2C driver to suppport EXYNOS5.
The cahnges made to driver are as follows:
- I2C base address is passed as a parameter to many
functions to avoid multiple #ifdef
- I2C init for Exynos5 is made as different function.
- Channel initialisatio
6 matches
Mail list logo