Hi Otavio,
On Saturday, September 28, 2013 9:08:48 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> > wrote:
> >> Dear Otavio Salvador,
> >>
> >> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvado
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>>
>> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
>>> nee
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>
> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
>> needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT mac
Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
> needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT macro.
There is already a STATUS_LED_ACTIVE definition (though not on
There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT macro.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
doc/README.LED| 2 ++
drivers/misc/status_led.c | 21 ++---
include/status_led.h | 14
5 matches
Mail list logo