Kim Phillips wrote on 2010/11/28 16:12:21:
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:59:55 +0100
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
> >
> > In message
> >
> > you wrote:
> > >
> > >Are you planning to apply some of my earlier patches(not this RFC
> > > series)
> > >or are you wait
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:59:55 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> >Are you planning to apply some of my earlier patches(not this RFC series)
> >or are you waiting for Freescale to Ack/pick up? So far nobody
> >has said anything.
>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:50:21 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/24 22:41:19:
> > > > > > > How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the
> > > > > > > image
> > > > > > > always appears at the same effective address?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hmm, never
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
>Are you planning to apply some of my earlier patches(not this RFC series)
>or are you waiting for Freescale to Ack/pick up? So far nobody
>has said anything.
I think these are all on Freescale's (Kim Phillips') list.
Best regards,
W
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/11/24 22:45:11:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > Played a little with this but it seems like two BATs cannot overlap?
>
> IIRC they can, but the first (lower register numbers) mapping wins.
This text from PPC PEM suggests otherwise:
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/24 22:41:19:
> > > > > > How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the
> > > > > > image
> > > > > > always appears at the same effective address?
> > > > >
> > > > > hmm, never thought of that. The extra bonus would be that LINK_OFF
> > > > > should
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> Played a little with this but it seems like two BATs cannot overlap?
IIRC they can, but the first (lower register numbers) mapping wins.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:36:27 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/24 18:16:56:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:04:15 +0100
> > Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 23:32:04:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
> > >
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/24 18:16:56:
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:04:15 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 23:32:04:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
> > > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 2
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:04:15 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 23:32:04:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
> > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58:
> > > > > "load address" being pre-relocation? Curren
>
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 23:32:04:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
> > Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58:
> > > > "load address" being pre-relocation? Currently these must be equal
> > > > (which doesn't seem particularly burdensome).
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 23:32:04:
>
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58:
> > > "load address" being pre-relocation? Currently these must be equal
> > > (which doesn't seem particularly burdensome).
> >
> > Yes, but
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:03:13 +0100
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear Scott Wood,
>>
>> In message <20101123163204.4f843...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>> >
>> > How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the image
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:03:13 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
>
> In message <20101123163204.4f843...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> >
> > How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the image
> > always appears at the same effective address?
>
> Not al
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <20101123163204.4f843...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the image
> always appears at the same effective address?
Not all systems have BATs.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engi
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58:
> > "load address" being pre-relocation? Currently these must be equal
> > (which doesn't seem particularly burdensome).
>
> Yes, but in our case we update the boot in the field and we want to
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58:
>
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:03:36 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 21:46:51:
> > > "Only these" that you've found so far, for the board you've tried --
> >
> > Yes, that is what I wrote.
>
> Yes, I was just emphasizing t
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:03:36 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 21:46:51:
> > "Only these" that you've found so far, for the board you've tried --
>
> Yes, that is what I wrote.
Yes, I was just emphasizing that. :-)
> > is it worth adding another pre-relocation lan
>
> Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 21:46:51:
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:51 +0100
> > Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Please document the specific circumstances in which one would need
> > to use this (any data-segment pointer before relocation?).
>
> Any ptr needing fixups:
> char *sptr = "hi";
>
Scott Wood wrote on 2010/11/23 21:46:51:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:51 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
> > board.
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
> > arch/powerpc/lib/board.c|2 +-
> >
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:51 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
> board.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
> arch/powerpc/lib/board.c|2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> dif
Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
board.
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
arch/powerpc/lib/board.c|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c
b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu
22 matches
Mail list logo
