On 14/08/2012 22:33, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> The clock dividers that were used do not match at all the reference manual.
> They
> were either completely broken, or came from an early silicon revision
> incompatible with the current one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> Cc: Stefano Babic
On 03/09/2012 17:55, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Yes, make this small change - then from my point of view I am ready to
> merge it.
Nevermind - this is really a detail. I prefer to fix soon the bugs.
Thanks for having discovered and fixed. I merge the series now.
Regards,
Stefano
--
==
On 03/09/2012 17:31, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Benoît,
>> It seems also to me that the current code is wrong if
>> MXC_CCM_PDR0_PER_SEL is set. Maybe it was never set. As I see in
>> figure
>> 5-4, the ipg_per_clk depends only on pdr[21:16]. No idea where the
>> second multipli
Hi Stefano,
On Saturday, September 1, 2012 11:15:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 14/08/2012 22:33, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > The clock dividers that were used do not match at all the reference
> > manual. They
> > were either completely broken, or came from an early silicon
> > revision
> > in
On 14/08/2012 22:33, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> The clock dividers that were used do not match at all the reference manual.
> They
> were either completely broken, or came from an early silicon revision
> incompatible with the current one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> Cc: Stefano Babic
The clock dividers that were used do not match at all the reference manual. They
were either completely broken, or came from an early silicon revision
incompatible with the current one.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
.../arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c|
6 matches
Mail list logo
