On 08/13/2012 06:28 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/13/2012 06:14 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> Let's use t
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 06:14 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
can'
On 08/13/2012 06:14 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>>> Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
>>> can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a f
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>> Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
>> can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a for
>> loop that won't get optimized away .Since we have the bu
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
> can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a for
> loop that won't get optimized away .Since we have the bus clock
> we can use the timebase to calculate wall time.
Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a for
loop that won't get optimized away .Since we have the bus clock
we can use the timebase to calculate wall time.
Looked at reusing the u-boot udelay functions but it pul
6 matches
Mail list logo
