On 13/07/2012 12:38, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Dirk Behme,
>
> [...]
>
>>> Ok, everything was already clear, and I can also add my:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Stefano Babic
>>
>> Same for this one: Is this applied anywhere? It doesn't seem to be part
>> of v2012.07-rc1?
>>
>> Best regards
>
> Stefano, o
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201207131238.11964.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > > > Ok, everything was already clear, and I can also add my:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Stefano Babic
> > >
> > > Same for this one: Is this applied anywhere? It doesn't seem to be part
> >
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201207131238.11964.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> > > Ok, everything was already clear, and I can also add my:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Stefano Babic
> >
> > Same for this one: Is this applied anywhere? It doesn't seem to be part
> > of v2012.07-rc1?
> >
> > Best reg
Dear Dirk Behme,
[...]
> > Ok, everything was already clear, and I can also add my:
> >
> > Acked-by: Stefano Babic
>
> Same for this one: Is this applied anywhere? It doesn't seem to be part
> of v2012.07-rc1?
>
> Best regards
Stefano, once you're out of mont blanc, can you apply this pleas
On 06.05.2012 17:27, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 06/05/2012 01:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 5/5/2012 2:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
Other then being very weird, this
On 06/05/2012 01:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Troy Kisky,
>
>> On 5/5/2012 2:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Troy Kisky,
>>>
On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Troy Kisky,
>
>> On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
>>> Other then being very weird, this code w
Dear Troy Kisky,
> On 5/5/2012 2:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Troy Kisky,
> >
> >> On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Dear Troy Kisky,
> >>>
> On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> > Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
> > For example, say I s
On 5/5/2012 2:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
as 85937. But the s
Dear Troy Kisky,
> On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Troy Kisky,
> >
> >> On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> >>> Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
> >>> For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
> >>> as 85937. But the speed is reall
On 5/5/2012 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Troy Kisky,
On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
as 85937. But the speed is really 85937.5, so we I reset
the speed to 85937, I'
Dear Troy Kisky,
> On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> > Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
> > For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
> > as 85937. But the speed is really 85937.5, so we I reset
> > the speed to 85937, I'll get 73660.7. After a co
Dear Troy Kisky,
> On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> > Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
> > For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
> > as 85937. But the speed is really 85937.5, so we I reset
> > the speed to 85937, I'll get 73660.7. After a co
On 4/24/2012 8:33 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
as 85937. But the speed is really 85937.5, so we I reset
the speed to 85937, I'll get 73660.7. After a couple of transactions
my speed is n
Other then being very weird, this code was also wrong.
For example, say I set speed to 100K. I'll read back the speed
as 85937. But the speed is really 85937.5, so we I reset
the speed to 85937, I'll get 73660.7. After a couple of transactions
my speed is now exactly 68750 so it will remain there.
14 matches
Mail list logo